Kernel + real-time OS semantics

[Malcolm Robb, LC 0112G]

I'm using assembler A.EXE ver 1.05 and disassembler D.EXE ver 0.10 which 
were supplied to me by Peter G in April 2000. I have no real complaints 
about either of them, and both are 'fit for the purpose intended'. But I 
can and will use any other assembler/disassembler if the 'group' decide to 
standardise on it.

That said, it ought to be possible to write and comment the code in such a 
way that any assembler can build the binary - unless you are Microsoft or 
Borland of course !

Count me in for a team effort. We really ought to specify a 'starting' code 
mask as well. What's the most commonly used P4 code version ? Once one is 
properly hacked and commented, the others ought to be easier for others to 
follow.

Cheers,
Malcolm Robb, LC 0112G

-----Original Message-----
From:	Pat Ford [SMTP:pat at istop.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:06 PM
To:	gmecm at diy-efi.org
Subject:	Re: Kernel + real-time OS semantics

Why don't we first settle on a disassembler that takes an .inc file ( any 
suggestions??) and make a team effort? Who is interested??
"Malcolm Robb, LC 0112G" wrote:
>
> What a great idea P4.inc would be. I'd also suggest including/using the
> variable and table names used in TurboP4.pdf too. That way anyone who 
knew
> how to understand one hac would be able to understand most others.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org