[Gmecm] Re: [Off Topic) and apology

[gary]

I find it appropriate to apologize to the GMECM list membership.

First, the list membership does not deserve to have the 'dirty laundry' 
of others thrust upon them.  Please accept my apology. 

Second, my last paragraph, of my previous post, could easily be 
construed (by anyone), as provocation on my part, directed at LJ.  
This implies my wording could also have been interpreted in this 
fashion, by LJ as well.  As such,  he deserves an apology from me
for that, as well. 

I would like to consider the 'suspect portion' of my previous post, 
a brief and one time breakdown of maturity.  I consider myself, as 
one to be expected, of far more mature posting.

Sincerely,
Gary    

Note:  To responsible member that it may concern.  Thank you for
bringing to my attention, my 'off base' comment, and questionable 
demeanor.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "gary" <gas- at charter.net>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Gmecm] Re: MAF specs and MAP replacement.


> Yea, beat me to the punch.  That was an oops.  My reply to my
> initial post would have noted the LT(x)  designation would not have
> been appropriate in that instance, as it should have read LT1
> exclusively.  The LT4 was not available until '96.
> 
> > That was admirable restraint on your part - flamethrower not
> > warmed up?
> 
> Don't go there fella.......
> I hope you can post as a mature grownup....  We'll find out.
> 
>GAS
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jeff Stevens" <9secz at comcast.net>
> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 5:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gmecm] Re: MAF specs and MAP replacement.
> 
> > > I am not aware of any '94 or '95 LTx variety of GM 350 (5.7) 
> > > V8 that DIDN'T have both MAF and MAP sensors.
> >
> > I'm not aware of any '94 or '95 LTx for which x is not equal to 1.  
> > But yes, your facts are correct, if possibly misleading.  '94 and '95 
> > LT1s are OBDI and use both MAF and MAP sensors.
> >
> > That was admirable restraint on your part - flamethrower not warmed 
> > up?  :)
> >
> > LJ