[Gmecm] Reasonable configuration?

[Jay Vessels]

Hi there!

I haven't seen anything (hacked or commercial) for the 3.4V6 SFI Camaro 
PCM, but that would be pretty cool...

If I were to go with MPFI on a V6/60 like the 3.4, I'd strongly consider 
the 1227730 ECM running $A1 code (3.1V6 MPFI VIN 'T', as in the '91-'94 
Cavalier Z24).  It's hacked, reasonably supported, and very tunable.

You might try poking around 60degreeV6.com as an additional reference.

Jay Vessels
1982 Chevrolet S-10 Sport, 2.8V6 TBI
1984 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer Sport, 2.8V6 (TBI pending)


Joe Simmons wrote:
> Whoa!!!!!!!   Back up!  The MPFI (with it's mass air sensor) allows a 
> LOT more forgiving cam grind / head work / exhaust work (especially cam 
> grind!) than a speed density TBI setup.  Granted, the TBI is simpler, 
> but anything that reduces the idle/cruise vacuum constitutes a major 
> tuning challenge.......wanna buy my V8'd S10????   BTDT in regard to 
> cam/head combo changes...it's NOT fun!
> 
> TBI is quite dependent on the output from the MAP sensor, and lowered 
> idle vacuum causes the ECM to think the engine is under load.
> 
> I'm sure there's a LOT of support for the MPFI......
> 
> Joe S
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eddie Sheffield" 
> <eddie_sheffield at yahoo.com>
> <snip!>
> 
> 
> I don't want to keep the stock MPFI from the Camaro since it
> 
>> doesn't seem to really allow much in the way of performance swaps (esp.
>> cams) and tuning.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Eddie