Undeliverable Message

[MAILER-DAEMON at seb.varian.com]

To:            <diy_efi at coulomb.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Cc:            
Subject:       Re: Carb vs Fuel Injection

Message not delivered to recipients below.  Press F1 for help with VNM
error codes.               

	VNM3036:  david atchley at m2000@tfs_bldg_6
At 08:10 AM 12/22/95, you wrote:
>Ok, it looks like no one reads Hot Rod.  In a previous post, I asked if
>anyone has read the issue of Hot Rod that had an article on
>Carburetion vs Fuel Injection.  Since I have not received a reply, I must 
>assume that either someone is too embarrassed to admit that they read
>Hot Rod or that no one reads it.  I tried to find it down at the
>University, but they stopped their subscription in 1991 :(.
>
>The title is Carburetion vs. Fuel Injection in the October 1, 1994 issue
>of Hot Rod.  The summary of the article is "the dyno doesn't lie."
>Derrick Early
>early at finite.nrl.navy.mil
>

I haven't read the article, but we do OK with just carbs.  We get
3000 BHP with an Impco 6 pack.  That's 220 psi BMEP!  Bet none of your
fuel injected engines have that kind of BMEP.  The carbs are quite durable
although they are not the best for transients, but who cares about transients
any way.

Oh, I suppose I should mention that's from a 214 liter turbocharged natural
gas engine used in industrial applications :-)

Jim Zurlo
zurlo at execpc.com