Are my messages getting through?

[Fred Miranda]

Mike,
Yes, your messages are getting through(at least to those still on the list).

Not all questions get responces, you never know.  Sometimes the most
trivial things generate all sorts of trafic. Several of mine have gone
unanswered.
(not trivial IMO)

As for your question regarding speed density versus maf for altitude changes,
my only experience is with some aftermarket systems. With those, speed density
doesn't cope too well if during the course of a drive you have a large change in
elevation. Something with a seperate baro sensor would work much better. 
Maybe the oems have this I don't know.

Fred

At 12:14 PM 1/26/97 PST, you wrote:
>
>
>Dear sirs,
> 
>I will be converting my K5 Blazer with sb350 to TPI in a couple a months and
>have heard many different opions on which system is better. Between a
>MAF('89 no cold start injector) based system and a MAP('90 or '91) system
>which would be the most desirable? Is one better able to compensate for
>major elevation change(sea level-10,000+ft)? Why? Which system would you
>recomend for a basically stock engine w/headers & free-flowing exhaust?
>
>Mike Jones
>rwj5125 at electriciti.com
>
>PS
>Are my messages getting through? This is the fourth time I have posted this
>question with no response what so ever. If anyone on the list gets this post
>please let me know, even if you don't know the answer.
>
>