[William A. Sarkozy]

At 12:14 PM 1/26/97 PST, you wrote:
>
>
>Dear sirs,
> 
>I will be converting my K5 Blazer with sb350 to TPI in a couple a months and
>have heard many different opions on which system is better. Between a
>MAF('89 no cold start injector) based system and a MAP('90 or '91) system
>which would be the most desirable? Is one better able to compensate for
>major elevation change(sea level-10,000+ft)? Why? Which system would you
>recomend for a basically stock engine w/headers & free-flowing exhaust?
>
>Mike Jones
>rwj5125 at electriciti.com
>
>PS
>Are my messages getting through? This is the fourth time I have posted this
>question with no response what so ever. If anyone on the list gets this post
>please let me know, even if you don't know the answer.
>
>Yes, they're getting through.  Everyone seems to be leaning toward MAP
systems because of their simplicity.  If you happen to salvage a COMPLETE
MAF system on a good deal, then that's another story.  I believe both work
fine.  My experience is with MAP and aftermarket computer and I'm very
pleased.  Good luck

                                                                            
          Bill