Open loop at WOT???

[TBK]

I was told at WOT, Closed Loop values are used. It is pseudo-quasi open
loop.

TK
-----Original Message-----
From: Reiswig, George <george.reiswig at intel.com>
To: 'richard vandervoort' <fastski at mailexcite.com>;
diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Cc: Reiswig, George <george.reiswig at intel.com>; Burleson, RandyX D
<randyx.d.burleson at intel.com>
Date: Monday, August 03, 1998 2:55 PM
Subject: RE: Open loop at WOT???


>Thanks for the response, Richard.  I suspected that that might be part of
>it, but wasn't sure.  I guess the OEMs don't think their cooling systems
are
>up to the task at consistent WOT?  Or is it because detonation is more
>likely at WOT?
>
>At any rate, thank you for the answer.
>
>GR
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: richard vandervoort [SMTP:fastski at mailexcite.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 03, 1998 2:06 PM
>> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
>> Cc: george.reiswig at intel.com
>> Subject: Open loop at WOT???
>>
>> The OEMs purposely run rich at WOT because the engine
>> runs cooler.  Emission are not regulated and there
>> isn't any effect on MPG numbers since they do not use
>> WOT during fuel economy testing, so there isn't any
>> penalty for running rich.  Someone has probably already answered this,
but
>> I couldn't find it in the archive.
>>
>>
>> Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere!
>> http://www.mailexcite.com
>