FW: MAF Upgrad

[Clare Snyder]

lkurek at smtpgate.anl.gov wrote:
> 
> Clare wrote:
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> > >
> >Why bother paralleling them? If they are identical, they will flow the
> >same amount of air each, so you only need one connected. Put a switch in
> >the circuit and you can carry a back-up.
> 
>      Only problem with this implementation is that each sensor would then
>      be flowing half of the total airflow, and reporting that to the ECM. I
>      would suspect that you would get a fairly lean condition with only
>      half the fuel required for the airflow :)
> 
> 
>      TTYL!
> 
>      Larry Kurek
All you guys like playing with fuel maps, don't you? Reprogram it, or
use an Op/Amp or frequency doubler, whichever is required.
-- 
                               _/\_
                       --|-----([])-----|--
                         S    0/  \0    B
         Alls well that ends well!! www.snyder.on.ca is back
                  E-Mail service is back to normal
                  To avoid bouncing E-Mail messages
                    Reply to Clare at snyder.on.ca
                                OR
Remove the R from clsnyder in my E-Mail Address to reply. Stop the
spammers!!!
It's hard to soar like an eagle when your stuck with a bunch of
Turkeys!!!