67F687 chip

[mike costa]

Come to think of it, I have all of the code and the interface software for
the development board on disk, but not the documentation.

Mike Costa
Computer & Systems Engineering Undergrad - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy <sganz at wgn.net>
To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Saturday, March 21, 1998 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: 67F687 chip


>I used to have all that somewhere, may even have it on disk with some
>beginnings to clean / hack the hc11 assemble. Just may be a dead end.
>
>Sandy
>
>At 03:06 PM 3/21/98 -0900, you wrote:
>>Mike -
>>
>>What documentation did you get with it? One thing I don't have
>>yet is an "application note" or example system, or sample code,
>>or whatever. Do you have such a thing?
>>If so, any chance of getting copies, scanned in or whatever?
>>
>>Thanks - Ron Webb
>>
>>mike costa wrote:
>>
>>> The SSI Chip is still in production and some suppliers are
>>> still able to get
>>> them. Unfornately TDK who now owns the sub division of SSI
>>> that
>>> manufactures the chip will not take on new distributors and
>>> will only meet
>>> demand produced by current distributors. The chip is as good
>>> as the data
>>> sheet makes it out to be. I'm currently constructing the SSI
>>> evaluation EFI
>>> system that they sold for $2500 to developers when the chip was
>>> first
>>> released. It is not done as of this time, but I am aware of
>>> others who have
>>> used the chip with success. I will be happy to answer any other
>>> questions
>>> you may have on the chip, but I will admit I am far from an
>>> expert on it.
>>>
>>> Mike Costa
>>> Computer & Systems Engineering Undergrade - Rensselaer
>>> Polytechnic Institute
>>>
>>> ----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ron & Cathy Webb <rwebb at polarnet.com>
>>> To: diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
>>> <diy_efi at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
>>> Date: Saturday, March 21, 1998 6:00 PM
>>> Subject: 67F687 chip
>>>
>>> >After you folks mentioned the Silicon Systems 67F687 Engine
>>> >Interface Peripheral chip, I went looking on the web, and
>>> found
>>> >the Data sheet (QuestLink, 55 pages). There is also a supplier
>>>
>>> >listed, who swears he can get them.
>>> >
>>> >If anyone has any first hand experience with the things, I'd
>>> be
>>> >interested, because they sure look wunnerful so far! Looks
>>> like
>>> >one of these things, tied onto one of the $89 microcontroller
>>> >boards I've been using, would just about make a complete
>>> system,
>>> >hardware wise.
>>> >
>>> >Anybody know for sure if they are vaporware? What's the catch
>>> >here - this looks too easy!
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>