[Diy_efi] Microcontrollers For use on DIY_EFI Systems
Tom Leser
tleser at purdue.edu
Tue Jul 16 13:33:58 GMT 2002
Hi Matt. I just finished a summer version of EET 309 where we learned the
AVR architecture and developed applications with a mega163 micro along with
the prllc.com development board. However the ATmega323 micro has twice the
EEPROM (1K), twice the SRAM (2K) and 1 extra PWM (4) then the 163. You can
request samples off of atmel's website as well. However when you're using
the ICP's the other periperhal's on that Timer are harder to make use of,
and it's very easy to use one of the ext. INT's as an input capture by using
Timer 0 as the ticks to count between either your rising or falling edge,
and when one occurs, you just set the MCUCR register to trigger on the other
edge and that's it! About the same as using ICP of Timer 1. If you are
thinking of using an RTOS lemme know since we worked with one in the class
and it supports 20 tasks.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Donohoe" <donohoem at iprimus.com.au>
To: <diy_efi at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 4:50 AM
Subject: [Diy_efi] Microcontrollers For use on DIY_EFI Systems
> Hi Guys,
>
> I've been developing with the Motorola 68HC11 but it's dated(as you all
know
> by now)
>
> I'm looking for something newer, it need not have SRAM or anythin fancy,
but
> a SRAM interface would be nice or a fair amount of ram so that tables can
be
> loaded into somethin easy to access the modified on the fly...
>
> It really needs 1-2 Input Capture ports(configurable for rising or
trailing
> edges, I prefer not to use Interrupts) as well as 2-3 Output capture ports
> with 16 bit counters and a 16 bit internal free running clock. The 16 bit
> output capture ports to do spark and the 16 bit internal clock to count
> between Crank Angle pulses to determine a few other things... A A/D
> converter and a fair few IO ports would be nice but I know that a 82C55
will
> expand the I/O ports...
>
> Please supply part numbers, it's preferable to get something like a Atmel
or
> something easy to program and get a hold of... A high MIPS rate would be
> excellent as it will leave a fair bit of overhead, also, as a bit of
> background I program in Assembly(thats how i was taught and I dont know C
so
> i'll sound old and say i'm affraid of something i dont know)
>
> Thanks guys, hope to talk to you about a running project in a bit...
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> __________________
> Matt Donohoe
> donohoem at iprimus.com.au
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Diy_efi mailing list
> Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
> http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi
_______________________________________________
Diy_efi mailing list
Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi
More information about the Diy_efi
mailing list