'98 Vortec 350 - Good swap into a Jeep?

Ken Kelly kenkelly at lucent.com
Wed Jul 7 19:06:12 GMT 1999


Shannen,
Ward,
	I didn't realize the 98 Vortec was distributorless. That
would be a problem with compatablity in the old PCM's. I
would assume that running a 747 would require adding a
distributor or modifying the 747 Code. Do any of the 747
Proms support a distributorless engine?

		Ken

Shannen Durphey wrote:
> 
> Ken Kelly wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused by all the comments on changing the intake,
> > etc. Using a Non-OBD-II computer does not require
> > changinging the intake manifold and Fuel system.
> >Any of the
> > TPI or later electronics could be used with the existing
> > Intake.
> Requires it?  No.  I was showing some options for cost effectiveness.
> Do I know whether the Vortech engine he's looking at is complete w/
> manifold?  No.  Will I say the only way to go is with the Vortec
> manifold?  No.
> 
> > What was the 95 computer used in
> > chevy trucks? Is it compatable with the wiring harness?
> 
> Is the 95 PCM plug-n-play with 96 harness?  Nope, it's not even
> close.  The 95 pickup used a dizzy based tbi system with the 16197427
> PCM.  Talking auto trans, 1/2 ton, 350 engine.  Vortech engine uses no
> distributor (technical point), crankshaft sensor, sequential pfi.
> 
> > Using a 730 or 747 would be a lot more work because of all
> > the custom wiring required,
> 
> Depends on your idea of work.  Modifying a harness one time can be
> less work and frustration than multiple attempts at modifying ecm
> tables.  I would suggest to a novice using a setup close to an
> existing calibration to start with.
> 
> >although you may be able to use
> > the harness and most of the sensors off the old TPI system
> > if the locations are similar.
> 
> Vortec units are different from previous pfi systems.  Physical
> changes to the wiring harness should be a minor issue, though.
> Shannen
> 
> >
> >         Or if you are running stock
> >keep the whole Vortec system.
> > Remember this means Cats, after cat O2 sensors, etc. It does
> > get tricky. There are some people out there making O2
> > simulators for the AfterCat O2 sensors, but by the time you
> > get done modifying the 99 PCM to get rid of OBD-II for your
> > Jeep you may be one of the List experts on the Vortec!!
> >
> >                 Ken
> >
> > > > I guess I'm asking for HELP and recomendations.  I've done engine swaps
> > > > before, I just have NO experience with a VorTec System.
> > >
> >>  For simplicity, you may want to consider using the new
> > > engine with an older computer and maybe the fuel system.
> > >
> 
> > > Shannen



More information about the Gmecm mailing list