More silly ideas

[Matt S Bower]

Bruce Plecan wrote:
> 
> Yep, in theory.  But, when you have Air Densities of 96% to 101% and the
> scanner shows the engine is at 98 K/Pa under both sets of conditions then
> there is a fly in the ointment.   Weither do to filtering,  the design of
> the sensor, or pulsation characteriestics, that the sensor is reading
> something is wrong.  Without an emission lab to do the research something
> needs done to compensate for it.   "My" baro/map idea isn't perfect, but
> it's a whole lot better than, being in error all the time, IMHO.....
> Grumpy

This sheds some light on what I wasn't seeing!  Now I understand the
reasoning for your methods.  This all brings me to what are the specs on
say a 1 bar map?