More silly ideas-MAP2

[Bruce Plecan]

| I think this would only work for adjusting to increases
| in BAR.  For decreases, such as driving up a mountain,
| how can you differentiate between a lower BAR and simple
| engine MAP?

You shouldn't have to.   At less than PE, feedback will correct it.
AT WOT then it is self correcting, when executed right.

| I kinda liked the idea of opening the MAP reference to
| atmosphere so the readings are relative to current BAR.
| I wonder why this isn't the method that's employed?
| There must be some sort of problem with it?

$$$,  like everything else gm does money rules..  If they can get close with
a software fix, then that's the way they go.  But, for 3 HP I'll buy a
second MAP.
Bruce
|
| -Mike
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-gmecm at esl.eng.ohio-state.edu
| [mailto:owner-gmecm at esl.eng.ohio-state.edu]On Behalf Of TK
| Sent: Friday, June 04, 1999 1:23 PM
| To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
| Subject: Re: More silly ideas-MAP2
|
|
| Seems to me I've seen code where the MAP is read at WOT for get a new Baro
| reading. In fact doesn't the 747 have something in there about this?
|
| Is this right Mr. Fenske?
|
| Terry
|