GM CCC carbed ecm et al
Mark Romans
romans at pacbell.net
Sat Nov 20 18:59:44 GMT 1999
Hi Bruce: It's great to see you home and feelin better!
I'll check out the Delco Catalog pix.
I installed the ZZ4 Carb'd replacement high peformance GM chip in my
brothers 85 El Camino today and got a code for prom error. I wonder if I
didn't cook it trying to read it with my Needham's? His ecm had two pn's on
it. 16036671 and 1226 865. I installed the stock prom back in and it
worked ok again. You know nothing ever just "Bolts on" #%$@!&*(_+##!!!!!
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Plecan <nacelp at bright.net>
To: gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu <gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Saturday, November 20, 1999 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: '7747 bin wanted
>On the differnt pintles 89 to 87 is one TBI, and the other TPI?.
>
>Mark: The Delco replacement catalog has some pix that help on that.
>Again as I recall
>Grumpy
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Mark Romans <romans at pacbell.net>
>To: <gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
>Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 2:36 AM
>Subject: Re: '7747 bin wanted
>
>
>| Which pintle was on which app? I have an 87 Vet that I have converted to
>89
>| software. My pintle is a double angle, blunt tip.
>| Mark
>| -----Original Message-----
>| From: Mike Rolica <mrolica at meridian-mag.com>
>| To: 'gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu' <gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu>
>| Date: Friday, November 19, 1999 8:38 PM
>| Subject: RE: '7747 bin wanted
>|
>|
>| >Found that on 89 vs 87 TPI, the IAC's are different part numbers.
Looked
>| at
>| >both closely, and the pintles are different. Others I don't know.
>| >
>| > <snip>
>| >
>| > There are different pintles? All the ones I've noticed seemed to
>| >be
>| > the same.
>| >
>| >
>|
>
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list