When asking ecm questions

[Mike Rolica]

Old??? Who is old?? How old are you? Better how old do you feel?  Age is in
the mind not in the body!  I figure Bruce must be 22-30, since old people
are stuck in the past are they not?  Is it not the old people that swear by
the carb? Probably because their mind is old, ram is full, can't fit any new
stuff in it, communication slow.........sorta sounds like a C3 eh?

Have a nice day.
Mike Rolica
EXT. 260
 :-)


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	nacelp at jvlnet.com [SMTP:nacelp at jvlnet.com]
	Sent:	Tuesday, October 26, 1999 12:44 PM
	To:	gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu;
gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu
	Subject:	Re: When asking ecm questions

	On  any given night  2.02 to 2.05, in 6-8 passes.  65dF to 85dF'ish,
too hot 
	track gets greasy, and never been out onna real cool night doing
60'ers.
	Going to extremes go off what I have tuned for, and the tires as
cheap as 
	they are lose some consistentcy, when real cool/hot. 
	Grumpy
	  I can do back to back runs of .05-.07sec, using my in 1/8 with
some 
	varriance in road surfaces themselves.  I've run .00 back to back
reaction 
	times onna good day.
	  When they allowed electronics in Brackets It became a weenie game
to me, 
	yes I was/will be again, that good.  But, it takes tricks to do it,
old and 
	what?.




	At 09:25 AM 10/26/99 -0700, gmecm at efi332.eng.ohio-state.edu wrote:
	>Hi Grumpy,
	>
	>What were the consistent 60' times?  
	>
	>Just wonderin....
	>
	>Thnx,
	>
	>Todd....
	>
	>----------
	>CSH-HQ wrote:
	>> 
	>> >> I've had to flat line the VE from 60-100 in some N/A to have
enough
	>> >> fuel for a loose converter, light car, with the 700r4 with
that dumb >
	>> 3.06 1st gear.
	>> >
	>> >Would seem that a dynamic situation would require a dynamic fix,
not
	>> >a fix using a static table?  Must drive the BLM/Int crazy during
closed
	>> >loop.
	>> 
	>> I tried tinker with the AE stuff, but nothing seeemed to work any
better.
	>> Part of it was not wanting to blow the tires off, so was also an
effort to
	>> lame things, a bit.  DId seem to work out well, since 60' times
were very
	>> consistant for cheapy tires.
	>> Grumpy
	>> >
	>> >
	>> >> They might have done it to try and light the turbo off quicker
	>> >(depending on what they did with the timing).
	>> >
	>> >>From where it is in the table, I seriously doubt that.  The
turbo
	>> >does not light off quicker with a rich mixture.  Maybe to slow
it
	>> >down?   More likey trying to make it work with that error....
	>> >
	>> >
	>> >> GM in error, hmm, <g>.
	>> >
	>> >It happens.  Found three wrong addressing mode errors in the
	>> >1228253 code.
	>> >
	>> >
	>> >> If you go P+H, might figure out what moves, and use a 749, I
lost the
	>> >> TCC when running 730 code in a 749, HTH
	>> >
	>> >I would go P&H with the 6 cyl SFI P4 ECM, the 1228253 (but the
	>> >underhood version).  Just change out the drivers for the five
lead
	>> >peak and hold drivers. But that is out a ways.  The 30 pound
injectors
	>> >should be plenty for the 3.1.
	>> >
	>> >Scot Sealander
	>> >
	>