Low temp thermostat
CSH-HQ
nacelp at jvlnet.com
Wed Oct 27 12:16:23 GMT 1999
The wide band would be neat, but what you really need is a stop watch/timer.
read the plugs, and time it, testing testing testing testing.
Grumpy
>
><snip>
>Grumpy wrote
>>IMHO it's a cheap + dirty way to "feel" faster. In some back to back
>>testing when optimized for AFR, I found no difference, and since I care
>>about the engine I went to 190.
>>
>>For every day use, I use a 190..
>>I still haven't seen a good reason for a 160/140 thermostat, period.
>>Other than it feels faster, or someone who did this without trying to
>>optimize the AFR first.
></snip>
>Whats the best way to check the AFR without the expensive wide
>range sensors, is the 10 led sensor or multimeter OK ?
>BTW I am not building anything just checking on standard vehicles
>to get a better idea of the workings
>where I work we do not have any emission test equipment :(
>Geoff
>
More information about the Gmecm
mailing list