Low temp thermostat

CSH-HQ nacelp at jvlnet.com
Wed Oct 27 12:16:23 GMT 1999


The wide band would be neat, but what you really need is a stop watch/timer.
read the plugs, and time it, testing testing testing testing.
Grumpy


>
><snip>
>Grumpy wrote
>>IMHO it's a cheap + dirty way to "feel" faster.  In some back to back 
>>testing when optimized for AFR, I found no difference, and since I care 
>>about the engine I went to 190.
>>  
>>For every day use, I use a 190..
>>I still haven't seen a good reason for a 160/140 thermostat, period.
>>Other than it feels faster, or someone who did this without trying to 
>>optimize the AFR first.  
></snip>
>Whats the best way to check the AFR without the expensive wide
>range sensors, is the 10 led sensor or multimeter OK ?
>BTW I am not building anything just checking on standard vehicles
>to get a better idea of the workings
>where I work we do not have any emission test equipment :(
>Geoff
>




More information about the Gmecm mailing list