Call for standards: EPROM/cal editing

[Dave Zug]

I understood your original post's question, it was a question about why it looks like some are treated one way and others are treated differently. harmless enough question but I thought others may have interpreted it another way (they did)

My responce was aimed at those who read it wrong, if you can follow that.

It also gave me a change to say terry's product and virtue is all good.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: WEG1192 at aol.com 
  To: gmecm at diy-efi.org 
  Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 9:07 AM
  Subject: Re: Call for standards: EPROM/cal editing 


  In a message dated 11/04/2000 10:10:58 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
  EOA at spartek.com writes: 



    I don't begrudge Terry for charging for his work. Writing the software is 
    easy compared to dissecting the bin's to get the correct data locations. I 
    also wouldn't expect a commercial package to adhere to a universal standard 
    for ECU files, that is their lifeblood. It would be nice if the free editors 
    did though (That is why we write them isn't it? to share?) or at least 
    provide a means for translating from one to the other... 


  OK, well now that another of my posts has been grossly misunderstood, I'll 
  simply say that I am all for Terry K or anyone else being able to sell what 
  they have designed for a profit. I have apologized to Terry off list for 
  inadvertently dragging his name into this. 

  JW 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.diy-efi.org/pipermail/gmecm/attachments/20001105/9be8627c/attachment.html>