VE and BLM cell edges

[Bob Wooten]

Dave,

does this not also relate to processor time & the whether or not the data
point in question NEEDs to be an instantaneous value or if historical data
of X age is acceptable for the calculation?

BW


> [Original Message]
> From: Dave Zug <dzug at delanet.com>
> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> Date: 1/19/01 3:19:58 PM
> Subject: Re: VE and BLM cell edges
>
> 
> That is called efficient coding! If some condition is already checked for
as
> part of another process (like the canister purge as discuvered here) then
> other processes only have to reffer to the result, not execute the check
> again.
> 
> This of coarse makes code hard to follow when not looking at its
> complimentary documentation. Keeps most of us from going the extra steps
to
> find out more,  you are a rare breed Bob ;-)
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <rrauscher at nni.com>
> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 10:07 AM
> Subject: Re: VE and BLM cell edges
> 
> > However, some of the canister purge qualifications are very
> > similar to what would be idle: if tps% < 3% or mph < 1.8, then
> > no canister purge. Then cell 4 is selected. There are some
> > other quals such as coolant temp and map (set to 0).
> >
> > BobR.
> >
> >
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> 



--- Bob Wooten
--- r71chevy at earthlink.net
--- www.r71camaro.homestead.com 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org