GMECM Digest V2 #763

[Mike Dillon]

>

Hi Ludis,

    I would think if there were to be a problem it would be in synchronous mode
where there may be an actual relation ship between injection and any one pariticular
intake event, I would think that in a async mode it would just be just pretty much the
average in average out maybe a couple a little on the rich side and 4 a little on the
lean side.

Mike D.

> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:14:28 -0800
> From: Ludis Langens <ludis at cruzers.com>
> Subject: Re: Odd fire Buick/Jeep V6 question
>
> Mike Dillon wrote:
> >
> >     What I was thinking is he could just run a V8 Distributor, and tell the ECU it was
> > a V8, then I think the only semi interesting thing is what to do with the extra 2 ignition
> > pulses, screw two plugs in to a bracket somewhere and hook them up so the extra
> > sparks have somewhere to go, other than though the roter or making carbon traces
> > in the cap ? , then I think the fuel,  advance  etc. table  could be tuned as usual, without
> > getting  too fancy. Any down sides ?
>
> You'd have to have hardware to disable fuel injection for the phantom
> cylinders.  You might also have problems with async injection (for accel
> enrichment) - the cylinders after the gaps will get more fuel than the others.
>
> - --
> Ludis Langens                               ludis (at) cruzers (dot) com
> Mac, Fiero, & engine controller goodies:  http://www.cruzers.com/~ludis/
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org