[Gmecm] BLM cell confusion

[Gary Evans]

What are you using to scan? Is there no way to see bpw on your setup?  
And you're sure that MAP is not below the minimum value for learn?


On Nov 11, 2005, at 12:21 PM, Ryan Hess wrote:

> well I just changed the BPW learn for off-idle high
> and low hysteresis values to 1.0 and 0.7mS
> respectively.  This time, I DID notice the cell 2 BLM
> change from the default 122 to 124 (which is a step
> forward).  However, the INT is still hanging around
> 137, proof that it could move more, but isn't.  All of
> the other conditions are being met - at least I assume
> the BPW is above 0.7, perhaps I need to drop it some
> more?  I did make sure to change the CCP enable
> coolant temp to FF, but maybe it's still coming on? So
> frustrating...
>
> Ryan
>
>
> --- Gary Evans <gary at garyandliz.com> wrote:
>
>> Closed loop conditions met (Coolant temp up, engine
>> run time met, no
>> fault codes, o2 sensor ready)
>> Charcoal canister not purging.
>> RPM between 400 and 6375
>> MAP above 22 kPa
>> BPW above 1.08
>>
>> If you are just revving the car in neutral, it is
>> likely that one of
>> the conditions is not being met.
>
>
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gmecm mailing list
> Gmecm at diy-efi.org
> http://lists.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/gmecm