[Diy_efi] Separate turbo list?

[Mike]

Yes, I agree - there is an interesting confluence of approaches
which we likely wouldnt see if there was any sort of
pedantic segregation ;)

rgds

mike


At 11:50 AM 1/7/03 -0600, you wrote:
>
>If the non-turbo guys on the list don't mind reading these types of
>threads, I would rather keep it here. It's great to get different opinions
>on theories from everyone....including users who don't live for
>turbochargers like some of us. If we are trying to take a formal vote,
>I'll give one vote for keeping it here, unless of course, people do feel
>like we are impeding. (I haven't got that feeling yet...) By the way, the
>activity on the list the last month or so has just been excellent. Let's
>keep it up, it's been very interesting to me.
>
>
>Nick Starai
>On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Dan D'Andrea wrote:
>
>> As I discussed with Steve Ravet earlier, perhaps we should look into
>> starting a separate turbo list.  I would really like to discuss many
varying
>> aspects of turbocharging but am starting to feel a bit guilty doing so on
>> the DIY EFI list.  How does everyone else feel about this?
>>
>> --Dan
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> The new MSN 8 is here: Try it free* for 2 months
>> http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Diy_efi mailing list
>> Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
>> http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Diy_efi mailing list
>Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
>http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi
>
>

_______________________________________________
Diy_efi mailing list
Diy_efi at diy-efi.org
http://www.diy-efi.org/mailman/listinfo/diy_efi