BinEditor Standard Configs?

Programmer nwester at eidnet.org
Sun Nov 26 16:40:51 GMT 2000


Beta test of what ???

Lyndon.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Zug" <dzug at delanet.com>
To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: BinEditor Standard Configs?


> We are.. well I'm working on the AFR graph section I set up when the
thread
> started and the formula was posted (yea same formula as in the HACS but I
> concentrated on it when it became of interest)... got me thinking about
> going a few steps farther than I had gone. I'm working towards not just
the
> % modifier, but trying to get a real WOT AFR based on the other vars. I
> didn't *want* to use the stoich AFR to change fueling for the nitrous
setup,
> but I did and now I need to transfer an exact equivelant curve over to the
> result with the stoich AFR set back to stock. the new graph let me do that
> very easily. In short, if the user has changed his Stoich AFR then the
> numbers your program puts out may mislead him if they are not compensated
> for. I have mine working now and it serves to point out the stoich change
> from stock if it has been changed.
>
> I have the 'winbin' standard in use for the config files, but the GUI is
so
> single purpose and self serving its a mess... never planned on anyone
using
> it. WHen the other standard is finished I think I'll keep winbin
standard..
> it was enough work implementing that I hate to lose the time. I'll
probably
> make a conversion utility section from winbin to the NEW standard in the
> package.
>
> I had sent a beta of this program to a few folks 15 months ago but never
got
> any feedback. Not unusual, they prolly had better stuff themselves, so I
> just kept it to myself and added along the year.... the AFR thing is the
> most recent and winbin standard I did when the standards thread went thru
> the list.  I have other far fetched functions that fell on their faces but
> are still incorporated for the day I really understand more.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <timsiford at hushmail.com>
> To: <gmecm at diy-efi.org>
> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 10:35 AM
> Subject: Re: BinEditor Standard Configs?
>
>
> > I second Dave on this one.  The architecture of the program that I am
> working
> > on will be setup in such a manner that I could modify the program to
> become
> > a fully bin editor.  However, I am not going to approach this unless
there
> > is a standard.
> >
> > Geez Dave ... sounds like we are working on the same sort of thing ;-)
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > At Fri, 24 Nov 2000 15:49:31 -0800, "Dave Zug" <dzug at delanet.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >What happened to the topic on the BIN Editor software "personality file
> > >standard" discussion?
> > >
> > >I been punching at a little package and had set it up to incorporate
> > >the
> > >standard, but lost sight of the thread...
> > >
> > >Anything agreed upon yet?
> > >
> > >
> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >--------
> > >To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the
quotes)
> > >in the body of a message (not the subject) to
majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
> > >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
> in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from gmecm, send "unsubscribe gmecm" (without the quotes)
in the body of a message (not the subject) to majordomo at lists.diy-efi.org




More information about the Gmecm mailing list